Politics

Women of #ELXN42: Margaret Atwood

Elle Beaver brings you profiles of the women who are shaping the 2015 federal election (#elxn42), the pundits, spin-doctors, journalists and activists who are making headlines, shaping our political landscape – and who are vying for YOUR vote! In this edition, we focus on author Margaret Atwood, whose censored editorial on hair sparked #HairGate.

Source: Macleans | Christopher Wahl

Source: Macleans | Christopher Wahl

It was a “flighty little caper on hair,” wrote Canadian author Margaret Atwood.  And yet her piece calling out the legitimacy of hair as an electoral issue for The National Post became one of the first notable episodes and hashtags of the 2015 Canadian federal election.  When Atwood’s piece was  posted to The National Post, (edited version) rapidly pulled and reposted sans a few key lines about the Duffy Affair and leadership donations to Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s re-election campaign, #HairGate set Twitter ablaze and highlighted the issue of censorship and the partisanship of Canada’s media (read the un-edited version in The Walrus).

While the debate on censorship was crucial, what commentators — including Elle Beaver *shameface* — failed to call out was the actual meaning of propelling hair into the electoral. Hair, an emblem of masculinity, of experience. Or femininity – read: Justin’s luscious, flowing locks.  As Atwood wrote,

Women will recognize “Nice hair” as a pickup line, so I suppose addressing it to a political opponent is a way of girlifying him: the Conservative ad-writers would see girlification as inherently demeaning, their view of girls and women being what it is.

The sub-text: Trudeau is a pretty girl. And who wants to vote for a GIRL?  We don’t even want them at our electoral debates!  And we CERTAINLY don’t want to debate THEIR issues!

hqdefault

But perhaps hair is indeed a metaphor for this election. After all, Harper’s own immovable coiffe is legendary in of itself. Unbending, unwieldy.  Much like his politics towards the courts, environmentalists, scientists, Indigenous communities, immigration policy, foreign policy, etc, so on and so forth, et al. Ad nauseum.

In the end, Margaret Atwood reminded us of the everyday sexism of federal politics in Canada, a liberal western democracy.  And that to insult a political opponent, all you need to do is call him a girl.  That being a girl, a woman, a female is actually *still* a fact worthy of an insult.  Let’s remember that tonight as Elizabeth May, Justin Trudeau, Gilles Duceppe and Thomas Mulcair gather tonight for #UpForDebate without the current sitting Prime Minister of Canada.

Read our Women of #ELXN42 profile of Elizabeth May and stay tuned for more profiles!

You May Also Be Interested In…

Cree Woman Wins Beauty Pageant, Immediately Turns Spotlight to Stephen “Missing and Murdered Women Not a Priority” Harper

Justin Trudeau Treats Female Voters Like Contestants on The Bachelor

4 thoughts on “Women of #ELXN42: Margaret Atwood

  1. Pingback: Women of #Elxn42: Jenni Byrne | Elle Beaver

  2. Pingback: Women of #Elxn42: Zunera Ishaq | Elle Beaver

  3. Pingback: Women of #Elxn42: Ashley Callingbull Burnham | Elle Beaver

  4. Pingback: Women of #ELXN42: Up for Debate | Elle Beaver

Leave a comment...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s